Creating the evidence to support Revalidation

The report, written by the Royal College of Surgeons of England, was funded by the Academy.

The project’s aim was to assess the strengths and weaknesses of using administrative data for revalidation in the areas of ischaemic heart disease, urological malignancies, and peripheral vascular disease. The Project Group distinguished between procedure-specific indicators and disease-specific indicators as well as between hospital-specific and consultant-specific outcomes.

Download this publication